Catholic News

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282078&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Newsroom, Jan 30, 2025 / 08:45 am (CNA).

The German Catholic bishops' conference on Wednesday distanced itself from a controversial statement against tougher migration policies issued by its Berlin office just before Parliament approved a motion on stronger border controls with support from the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

In a 348-345 vote on Jan. 29, Germany's Parliament approved a nonbinding motion calling for stronger border and asylum rules.

The measure passed with support from the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU/CSU), Free Democrats (FDP), and the Alternative for Germany (AfD).

A source within the German bishops' conference confirmed to CNA Deutsch, CNA's German-language news partner, on Wednesday evening that an internal letter from Beate Gilles, general secretary of the bishops' conference, said majority opinion among bishops had been to avoid public intervention in the election campaign.

The letter distanced the bishops from a document issued by the Catholic office in Berlin on Jan. 28, which strongly criticized proposed migration legislation.

The revelation came after Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg publicly disavowed the Berlin document, telling Communio magazine: "The current position statement against a CDU/CSU draft law does not speak in my name. I distance myself from it in every way."

CDU leader Friedrich Merz, who introduced the motion, said the move was "necessary" despite criticism from Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who called the cooperation with AfD an "unforgivable mistake."

Merz now plans to propose binding legislation on Friday aimed at curbing illegal immigration numbers in the wake of the most recent fatal stabbing attack in Germany, one of a spate of violent crimes by migrants that have inflamed public debate.

Divisions within German Catholicism

The controversy has highlighted divisions within German Catholicism regarding migration policy.

While the Berlin Church office warned of ''damage to democracy," others like theologian Ludger Schwienhorst-Schönberger, recipient of the 2021 Joseph Ratzinger Prize, offered a different perspective.

"We are not obligated to do good to all people — simply because we cannot," Schwienhorst-Schönberger told Cicero magazine, citing traditional Catholic moral theology principles about practical limits to charitable obligations.

Election context

With federal elections due on Feb. 23, polling has shown the AfD as Germany's second most popular party. The party is variously described in the media as a populist, right-wing, or far-right extremist outfit.

The German bishops' conference has previously declared the AfD "unelectable" for Christians, citing the party's "ethnic nationalism" ideology — a finding the party has categorically rejected, according to CNA Deutsch.

Catholic members of the party have come under pressure.

The rise of the AfD reflects broader European trends, where parties critical of illegal migration, Islam, and leftist ideologies have gained significant ground, such as Marine Le Pen's National Rally in France and Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom in the Netherlands.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282077&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Vatican City, Jan 30, 2025 / 11:15 am (CNA).

Pope Francis extended his condolences after an American Airlines jet carrying 64 people collided with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter near Washington, D.C.'s Ronald Reagan National Airport on Wednesday night.

The pope sent a personal message to President Donald Trump on Jan. 30 as search efforts continued in and around the Potomac River where the aircraft crashed. Officials indicated on Thursday morning that they did not believe there were any survivors.

"After learning of the mid-air collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, I express my spiritual closeness to all those affected by this tragedy," the pope said.

"In commending the souls of the deceased to the loving mercy of Almighty God, I offer my deepest sympathies to the families who are now mourning the loss of a loved one. I likewise pray for those involved in the recovery efforts and invoke upon all in the nation the divine blessings of consolation and strength."

Pope Francis chose to sign the message personally, departing from the usual protocol of sending it via the Vatican secretary of state.

The collision occurred around 9 p.m. on Jan. 29 as American Eagle Flight 5342 en route from Wichita, Kansas, was approaching Reagan National Airport. 

The jet was carrying 60 passengers and four crew members. The military helicopter was on a training mission with three soldiers on board. 

Emergency response teams have recovered at least 28 bodies from the Potomac River, where wreckage from both aircraft was found. With all passengers feared dead, the accident is likely the deadliest plane crash in the U.S. in more than 20 years. 

Passengers on the flight included a group of figure skaters, coaches, and their family members  returning from the U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Wichita, according to the U.S. Figure Skating association. 

Russian former world ice skating champions Yevgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov were among those on board, according to Russian state media.

The Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board have launched an investigation to determine the cause of the collision. Preliminary reports suggest that the helicopter crew was aware of the approaching jetliner, as indicated by radio communications with air traffic control, according to Reuters. The Pentagon has also initiated its own inquiry into the incident.

Bishop Michael Burbidge, the bishop of nearby Arlington, Virginia, also offered his condolences in a post on the social media platform X.

"May we be united in prayer for all those tragically impacted by the accident near Reagan airport. We ask God to embrace them in his love; to grant strength to their families; and to watch over all first responders," the bishop said.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282065&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Jan 29, 2025 / 15:20 pm (CNA).

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York strongly criticized comments Vice President JD Vance made on Sunday questioning the motives of U.S. Catholic bishops in their efforts to serve migrants and resettle refugees, in which Vance suggested financial incentives were their driving force rather than compassion.

Vance, a Catholic who took office last week, was asked Jan. 26 about the bishops' criticism of the Trump administration's various new directives on immigration, specifically the government's rescinding of a policy that previously restricted immigration arrests at "sensitive locations" such as churches.

"I think that the [U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops] needs to actually look in the mirror a little bit and recognize that when they receive over $100 million to help resettle illegal immigrants, are they worried about humanitarian concerns? Or are they actually worried about their bottom line?" Vance replied. 

Asked if he believed the U.S. bishops are "actively hiding criminals from law enforcement," Vance argued that the USCCB has "not been a good partner in commonsense immigration enforcement that the American people voted for, and I hope, again, as a devout Catholic, that they'll do better."

Dolan on Tuesday expressed frustration over Vance's implication that the bishops' pro-immigrant stance was merely a financial calculation, calling the comments "scurrilous" and "very nasty."

"I was really disappointed with what he said on 'Face the Nation' the other day. And I don't mind telling you, somewhat hurt. This was not only harmful, this was inaccurate. You heard what he said: 'Oh, the bishops, they're pro-immigrant because of the bottom line, because they're making money off this.' That's just scurrilous. It's very nasty, and it's not true," Dolan said, speaking on his weekly SiriusXM show "Conversations with Cardinal Dolan."

Dolan said the Church's involvement in migration and refugee services is frequently at the behest of secular leaders such as mayors and governors, who he said recognize the Church's ability to manage resources efficiently and transparently.

"You want to come look at our audits, which are scrupulously done? You think we make money caring for the immigrants? We're losing it hand over fist … we're not in a money-making business," he continued. 

Some political leaders and commentators have accused the U.S. bishops of complying with or facilitating illegal immigration through their refugee resettlement program, a charge the bishops have strongly denied. Critics have also scrutinized the large sums of money that the USCCB receives each year from the government to resettle refugees, which in recent years has been over $100 million a year.

The USCCB recently defended its long-standing refugee program as a "work of mercy," pointing out that every person they help to resettle "is vetted and approved for the program by the federal government while outside of the United States" and reiterating that despite the large sums of money involved, the costs of refugee resettlement often exceed the government's reimbursement.

In 2023, the latest year for which figures are available, the USCCB spent nearly $131 million on migration and refugee services, with nearly $130 million of that cost being covered by government grants, primarily from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of State.

Despite his disappointment, Dolan expressed hope that Vance's comments were uncharacteristic and not reflective of Vance's usual thoughtful demeanor. Dolan also acknowledged, with appreciation, Vance's supportive stances on Catholic family life and education.

"[From] a guy who has struck me as a gentleman and a thoughtful man, and from whom I'm still expecting great things — I hope it was an uncharacteristic moment. I thought it was a letdown," the cardinal concluded.

The work of the U.S. bishops and the major humanitarian agency Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA) as related to migrants and refugees has been vigorously debated in recent days amid the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's new — and now-rescinded — spending freeze on federal grants to nonprofit organizations, first announced Jan. 27. 

Catholic Charities, which is composed of 168 diocesan agencies, serves millions of people in need each year across the country by providing affordable housing, food, and disaster relief, as well as immigration services. In addition to donations and other sources, some Catholic Charities agency programs are partially funded through federal aid. 

The president of CCUSA had this week urged the Trump administration to "rethink" its pause on federal funding, noting the "millions of Americans who rely on this life-giving support."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282064&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Jan 29, 2025 / 15:40 pm (CNA).

The White House on Wednesday pulled back on a directive that had ordered federal agencies to pause federal grants and loans amid a flurry of executive actions from President Donald Trump.

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had issued a memorandum on Monday that directed all federal agencies "to the extent permissible under applicable law … [to] temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all federal financial assistance" that could conflict with recent executive orders from Trump.

The memo specified that funding for programs "including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal" would be paused.

But on Wednesday OMB walked back the directive. Multiple news outlets reported that the office had "rescinded" the memorandum without comment. 

The apparent walkback added another layer of whiplash to what was already a chaotic week in Washington. On Tuesday U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan had temporarily blocked the order just minutes before it was scheduled to take effect, with the block scheduled to last until Monday. 

On Wednesday afternoon White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X that the OMB walkback was "NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze." 

"It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo," she wrote. "Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction."

"The president's [executive orders] on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented," she wrote.

AliKhan's injunction against the freeze came after several states and nonprofits filed lawsuits against the Trump administration regarding the pause. 

On Tuesday Catholic Charities USA President and CEO Kerry Alys Robinson released a statement arguing against the proposed halt in federal financial assistance.

"For more than a century, the Catholic Charities network has worked with the government to care for poor and vulnerable people in every community in the U.S., and we continue to be eager to work with government to care for our neighbors in need," Robinson said. "We strongly urge the administration to rethink this decision."

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282063&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 29, 2025 / 16:10 pm (CNA).

A study published last week found that the active ingredient used in a common morning-after "emergency contraceptive" can be used to induce a chemical abortion at least up to the ninth week of pregnancy.

The study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine on Jan. 23, found that ulipristal acetate is an "effective" drug for causing an abortion. This drug is the active ingredient in the morning-after pill commonly marketed as "ella" or "ellaOne," which is advertised as a non-abortive contraception used only to prevent pregnancy.

Researchers gave 133 pregnant women from Mexico City each a dosage of 60 milligrams of ulipristal acetate to induce an abortion. The women were then given misoprostol, which expels an unborn child from the mother by inducing contractions.

The study was conducted by Gynuity Health Projects and the National Autonomous University of Mexico and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Mexico City Health Secretariat. 

Gynuity Health Projects — an organization that seeks to increase access to chemical abortions — has in the past been criticized by pro-life groups for conducting clinical trials on pregnant women around the world to test the effectiveness of second-trimester chemical abortions. 

The organization has received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and many other wealthy donors.

According to the recent study, the drug combination of ulipristal acetate and misoprostol completed an abortion in 129 cases — a success rate of 97%. This is about equal to the success rate of the abortion pill mifepristone — which is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to abort an unborn child up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in conjunction with misoprostol to expel the child.

The 60-milligram dose of ulipristal acetate used in the study is double the dose recommended for using the same drug as an "emergency contraceptive." The study did not test whether lower doses could induce abortions.

Gynuity Health Projects President Beverly Winikoff, the lead researcher, told CNA she believes "this is the first study that shows the possibility of using [ulipristal acetate] for abortion" but that "just looking at the chemical structure, it has a structure very similar to mifepristone," which is already used for abortion.

Aaron Kheriaty, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told CNA that a similar chemical structure does not necessarily mean both drugs will have the same effect but added that "it should have been investigated" in the FDA approval process.

Ulipristal acetate, he said, "makes the environment in the womb inhospitable to continue life." He said whether someone takes it shortly after sexual intercourse or several weeks later, "it is doing the same thing" and in the cases documented in the study, "causing an abortion rather than preventing the conception of a human being in the first place."

Kheriaty noted that even if taken soon after sexual intercourse, the drug can prevent a fertilized egg, which is already "a new human being," from attaching to the uterus, ensuring the "early embryo can't survive."

"It's long been known that the mechanism of action of the morning-after pill … is to produce an early abortion," Kheriaty said.

Joseph Meaney, a senior fellow at the National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC), told CNA that the study indicates that ella "can be abortifacient in its mode of action."

"Ulipristal acetate clearly works as an abortion pill," Meaney said. "The question is how often does it abort very early pregnancies when used as so-called 'emergency contraception?'"

The Vatican and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops have warned for years that emergency contraceptives could induce abortions in early pregnancies, which pharmaceutical companies have consistently denied.

Ella still marketed as a non-abortive drug

Pharmaceutical companies market ella or ellaOne as a non-abortive drug that only prevents a pregnancy and will not end an existing pregnancy or harm a child in the mother's womb. It is prescribed for women up to five days after sexual intercourse.

Ellarx.com, operated by HRA Pharma America — a subsidiary of the Perrigo Company plc — claims ella is not an "abortion pill," adding: "It won't end an existing pregnancy."

"Emergency contraceptives like ella [work] by delaying or preventing ovulation, which stops pregnancy from occurring in the first place," the website states in its section for frequently asked questions.

Similarly, ellaOne.co.uk lists among its morning-after pill "myths" that "the morning-after pill is a form of abortion" and adds "if the morning-after pill is taken by someone who is already pregnant, emergency contraception will not interrupt this pregnancy." This website is also operated by Perrigo. 

Perrigo issued a statement to the New York Times standing by that position, saying the study gave women a higher dose of ulipristal acetate than what is in one pill of ella, asserting "there continues to be no evidence to show that, on its own, ella causes an abortion." One ella pill has 30 milligrams of ulipristal acetate, which is half of what the study used.

"Ella is an FDA-approved emergency contraception pill that acts before pregnancy can occur," the statement added.

Winikoff, however, told CNA: "The study we published could make it possible for people to use [ulipristal acetate] for abortions," adding that "the drug is FDA approved, and this is just another use for it."

Kheriaty told CNA he believes the findings "place the medication in the same category as other drugs used for chemical abortions like mifepristone." He said advertising it as a non-abortive drug is "clearly misleading, and it's something the FDA should investigate."

Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, an NCBC senior ethicist, told CNA the study "reveals that [ulipristal acetate] can also be used in higher doses for the first step of a chemical abortion, again reminding us how closely connected contraception and abortion really are — 'two fruits of the same tree,'" quoting St. John Paul II's encyclical Evangelium Vitae. 

"In broad terms, we can see how contraceptive acts enable a couple to 'quench the possibility' of a family by doing away with the prospect of a child even before that life is conceived," Pacholczyk added.

"The logic behind 'quenching our offspring' can now be extended further, as the active ingredient in ella will now likely become part of the regimen for initiating many early chemical abortions around the globe and directly ending countless unborn lives," he said.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282062&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

Washington D.C., Jan 29, 2025 / 17:05 pm (CNA).

During his first confirmation hearing, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated at several points that he would implement President Donald Trump's pro-life policies. 

Republican and Democrat senators on the Senate Finance Committee pressed Kennedy on his views on abortion and "reproductive health," asking him how he would approach the issue of life while carrying out his duties as head of HHS.

In the three-hour hearing, Kennedy fielded questions on his interpretation of Title X, late-term abortions, mifepristone, stem cell research, and medical conscience rights. 

"I'm going to support President Trump's policies on Title X," Kennedy said in his first exchange regarding abortion with Republican Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma.

"I agree with President Trump that every abortion is a tragedy," Kennedy stated. "I agree with him that we cannot be a moral nation if we have 1.2 million abortions per year, I agree with him that the states should control abortion."

"I'm going to serve at the pleasure of the president," he continued. "I'm going to implement his policies," he said, revealing that Trump had expressed his desire for Kennedy to end late-term abortions, enact protections for conscious exemptions, and end federal funding for abortions in the U.S. and abroad. 

On medical conscience exemptions, Kennedy said: "What patient would want somebody doing a surgery on them that, you know, believes that that surgery is against their conscience and is being forced to perform that? I don't know anybody who would want to have a doctor perform a surgery that the doctor is morally opposed to."

"Forcing somebody to participate in a medical procedure as a provider that they believe is murder does not make any sense to me," he continued, adding: "We need to welcome diversity in this country, we need to respect diversity, and we need to respect each other when we have different opinions and not, you know, not force our opinions on other people." 

Kennedy also answered questions on his views regarding chemical abortions, stating that his approach to the drug would mirror that of Trump, who, he noted, has yet to adopt an official position on whether he supports the use of chemical abortion drugs such as mifepristone. The HHS nominee did, however, criticize the Biden administration for deregulating the abortion drug and for ending reporting requirements. 

Mifepristone is a drug used to induce a chemical abortion by blocking the hormone progesterone, which cuts off the child's supply of oxygen and nutrients. The Food and Drug Administration's label estimates that about 1 in 25 women who take mifepristone "will visit the emergency room." 

"It should be reported; I mean, it's against everything we believe in in this country, that patients or doctors should not be reporting adverse events," Kennedy said, adding: "I think it's immoral to have a policy where patients are not allowed to report adverse events or doctors are discouraged from doing that." 

Several members of the committee questioned Kennedy on his past pro-abortion views, including Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan, who quoted Kennedy as saying: "I don't think the government has any business telling people what they can or cannot do with their body" during a campaign visit to New Hampshire in 2023. 

Kennedy responded simply: "I agree with President Trump — every abortion is a tragedy." 

Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Washington, questioned Kennedy about his support for stem cell research at the University of Washington, which the senator said had conducted "groundbreaking" research using fetal heart tissue. 

Kennedy responded by saying: "I will protect stem cell research, and today stem cell research can be done on umbilical cords." 

"You don't need fetal tissue," he said. 

In November, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump nominated Kennedy to serve as the United States secretary of the HHS, a position that requires Senate confirmation. HHS oversees 10 agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Kennedy is a former Democrat. He ran for president as an independent in 2024 before dropping out and endorsing Trump. Kennedy is set to have another hearing tomorrow before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282033&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Jan 29, 2025 / 06:00 am (CNA).

It's something most Catholics have probably heard at Mass at some point: An announcement that "gluten-free" or "low-gluten" hosts are available either during Communion or directly afterward so that Catholics with gluten sensitivities can participate in the Blessed Sacrament with minimal discomfort. 

But how are low-gluten hosts manufactured? 

The Church's canon law is strict: The "most holy Eucharistic sacrifice" can be offered only with unleavened bread made "only [from] wheat," meaning gluten-free flours are not permitted. 

Canon law dictates that Communion can be distributed "under the form of wine alone in a case of necessity," but many parishes have opted for the low-gluten option for Catholics who need it. 

Though the practice may seem recent, it has actually been an active question for Church leaders for more than three decades. 

In August 1994, the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith's prefect, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — the future Pope Benedict XVI — issued the directive "Norms for Use of Low-Gluten Bread" in which the prelate noted that while altar bread "quibus glutinum ablatum est," or "with the gluten removed," was invalid for the sacrament, "low-gluten hosts" would be considered "valid matter."

The bread in question must contain "the amount of gluten sufficient to obtain the confection of bread" and must not contain any "foreign materials" other than wheat and water.

Further, the process for making the hosts must not "alter the nature of the substance of the bread," Ratzinger directed. The cardinal issued these directives to bishops worldwide in a 1995 letter.

So how are low-gluten hosts made?

The Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration in Clyde, Missouri, are among the numerous abbeys and monastic communities in the U.S. that produce altar bread. They are also known for developing and marketing a low-gluten host.

Sister Ruth Starman, the head of altar bread production at the abbey, told CNA via email that their abbey produces low-gluten hosts "by combining two different wheat starches that have had most of the gluten removed." The starches are removed via a special milling process.

"We use the same type of baker as regular Communion hosts," she said. "The mixing process is a little harder because the wheat starch makes a more gelatinous batter or 'sticky' batter than regular flour does."

The Clyde abbey was the first U.S. producer of altar breads approved by the Vatican to make low-gluten hosts. The sisters previously told CNA that it took over 10 years of experimentation for the sisters to develop the right recipe.

"We were done with an experiment for the day and kind of had a little batter left on the spoon, so we flicked it onto the waffle iron and forgot about it and went and washed dishes," Sister Jane Heschmeyer, who works in the altar bread department, said in an interview.

"We opened [the waffle iron] up and there was a lacy-looking edible thing. So we ate it right away and forgot how we got there, but the Holy Spirit helped us get back to that."

Starman told CNA that the nuns have been making the hosts since 2004. "We still get new patrons every month," she said.

Asked about the history of the practice, the nun told CNA that low-gluten hosts "were not produced before [modern times] as far as I know."

"I don't know if gluten sensitivity would have even been 'known' in past days," she noted. "It could have existed but I don't know if it would have been specifically diagnosed."

After developing their recipe for low-gluten hosts, the sisters had them tested in a lab for their gluten content and also asked several volunteers with celiac disease to eat the hosts and report any adverse effects.

The scientists found that the hosts contained just .001% gluten, low enough to be safe for most people with celiac disease while still satisfying the norms for Communion.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282032&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Jan 29, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).

The Vatican has issued a decree recognizing the heroic virtues of the Servant of God Luigia Sinapi, declaring her "venerable." The Italian woman was a lay mystic who had a vision of Jesus and the Virgin Mary and maintained a friendship with St. Pio of Pietrelcina, Italy, better known as Padre Pio.

Driven by her deep love for Jesus from an early age and claiming to have had visions of Mary, Jesus, and angels, her mother took her, in the mid-1920s, to San Giovanni Rotondo to meet Padre Pio, the saint recognized for bearing the stigmata on his hands, feet, and side. From that time, she maintained a close relationship with him, receiving his guidance and spiritual support throughout her life.

Sinapi was born Sept. 8, 1916, in Itri, Italy, and was baptized eight days later. According to the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints, at age 15 she felt the call to religious life and entered the Institute of the Pious Society of the Daughters of St. Paul in Rome. However, she had to leave the institute due to serious health problems.

The dicastery states that in November 1931, after the death of her parents, she was taken in by an aunt in Rome. To cover the costs of her stay, she began working as a domestic servant and later found employment at a post office and then at the Central Statistical Office.

Years later, Sinapi fell ill with cancer and was on the verge of death. However, on Aug. 15, 1935, the solemnity of the Assumption of Mary, she received the anointing of the sick and had a vision of Jesus and Mary, who miraculously healed her. From then on, she decided to live offering her sufferings for the evils of the world and for the salvation of priests and all souls.

During the Second World War she took refuge in her hometown and, upon returning to Rome, she lived in precarious conditions due to the hardships of the postwar period. From 1956 to 1970 she worked at the National Institute of Geophysics as secretary to the Venerable Servant of God Enrico Medi.

"She combined her work with an intense life of prayer, animated by a profound interior spirituality and characterized by various sufferings, accompanied by numerous mystical gifts," the website of the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints states.

By then, Sinapi was a Third Order Franciscan and, in 1954, she obtained dispensation to also enter the Third Order of the Children of Mary, to which her spiritual director belonged.

The Vatican website explains that at that time, Sinapi maintained a deep spiritual bond with St. Pio of Pietrelcina and enjoyed the trust of Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII. In 1937, after a revelation from the Virgin at Tre Fontane in Rome, she predicted his election to the pontificate.

"She spent the last period of her life at home offering hospitality, listening, offering advice and spiritual consolation to all who came to her. She died of gastric cancer on April 17, 1978, with a well-attested reputation for holiness and [supernatural] signs," the publication adds.

Supernatural gifts and acts of charity

The Dicastery for the Causes of Saints explains that Sinapi's existential journey "was accompanied by numerous supernatural gifts such as precognition of events and situations, bilocation, discernment of spirits and, above all, mystical union with the Lord Jesus, lived in an atmosphere of modesty, humility, and service."

In this context, many people, including priests, bishops, politicians, and parishioners, approached her seeking spiritual consolation. She helped many priests not only with prayer but also with material aid.

In addition to these supernatural manifestations, "she knew how to carry with extreme naturalness this burden of involuntary exceptionality, of love for God and for others, demonstrating, in the practice of virtues and in the capacity for sacrifice, total obedience to the Church and its representatives," the Vatican website notes.

Devotions and spirituality

She had a deep devotion to saints such as St. Francis of Assisi, St. Gemma Galgani, and St. Thérèse of the Child Jesus. Her spirituality, centered on the Eucharist and Mary, led her to help those in need, even in the midst of her own poverty.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282027&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

CNA Staff, Jan 28, 2025 / 19:52 pm (CNA).

The president of Catholic Charities USA has urged the Trump administration to "rethink" its pause on federal funding for executive departments, noting the "millions of Americans who rely on this life-giving support."

In a two-page memo on Monday the Office of Management and Budget directed all federal agencies "to the extent permissible under applicable law … temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all federal financial assistance" that could conflict with President Donald Trump's policies as outlined in his recent executive orders.

The memo specified that funding for programs "including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal" would be paused.

Though the memo put the pause into effect on Jan. 28 at 5 p.m., a federal judge in the District of Columbia temporarily blocked the order on Tuesday. 

In response to news of the freeze on federal grants, Catholic Charities USA President and CEO Kerry Alys Robinson released a statement calling attention to the work the organization does for the needy. 

"For more than a century, the Catholic Charities network has worked with the government to care for poor and vulnerable people in every community in the U.S., and we continue to be eager to work with government to care for our neighbors in need," Robinson said. "We strongly urge the administration to rethink this decision."

Robinson pointed to the effect that a federal freeze could have on those who rely on Catholic Charities. 

"The millions of Americans who rely on this life-giving support will suffer due to the unprecedented effort to freeze federal aid supporting these programs," Robinson said. "The people who will lose access to crucial care are our neighbors and family members. They live in every corner of the country and represent all races, religions, and political affiliations." 

Catholic Charities has operated in the U.S. for more than a century. It is currently made up of 168 diocesan Catholic Charities agencies serving millions of people each year. It works to provide affordable housing, food and nutrition, and disaster relief as well as supporting health, workforce development, and immigration services. More than half of the funding for Catholic Charities comes from government contracts. 

"Last year, 92% of the services provided by the 168 independent Catholic Charities agencies around the country covered basic needs — access to food, housing, health care, and other necessities — for families and individuals struggling to get by," Robinson said.  

"These vital services include food pantries for those who can't afford groceries, child care programs for low-income families, meal deliveries for homebound seniors, job training resources for veterans, temporary and permanent housing, mental health services, and much more." 

Trump administration officials said that programs providing individual assistance to Americans — such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, student loans, and food stamps — would not be affected. 

What the exact effect will be on Catholic Charities and other charitable organizations is still unclear. 

At a White House press conference on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was  asked if the president intended "to permanently cut off funding to NGOs that are bringing illegal foreign nationals to the country, such as Catholic Charities."

Leavitt responded: "I am actually quite certain that the president signed an executive order that did just that, and I can point you to that."

Last year, the country's bishops rejected claims that Catholic nonprofit organizations such as Catholic Charities are complicit in harboring migrants who illegally cross the Texas border.

Full Article

http://www.myspiritfm.com/News?blogid=8838&view=post&articleid=282025&link=1&fldKeywords=&fldAuthor=&fldTopic=0

ACI Prensa Staff, Jan 28, 2025 / 16:15 pm (CNA).

A Pakistani court has sentenced four young men to death for allegedly posting blasphemous content against Islam on social media, a prosecuting attorney said Jan. 27. The condemned men, who are Muslim, are between 20 and 32 years old and are from Punjab province.

A member of the Voice of the Victims of Blasphemy Business Group, a support group formed by families affected by the alleged blasphemy charges, requesting anonymity told UCA News that "three of them are from Lahore, while one is from Bahawalpur. They were trapped in the same pattern of being lured into social media groups where controversial content was shared. They were also tricked into saving the blasphemous content on their phones and sharing it with others."

"Their parents are worried and are at a loss about what to do. Their lawyer was hopeful of the acquittal, but the judges were not ready to listen to our pleas. Everything looks preplanned," he added.

A lawyer, Nasir William, a member of the advocacy group Center for Social Justice (CSJ), expressed concern about the growing persecution of Christians and alleged cases of blasphemy in Pakistan, which have risen sharply in recent times.

"Activists are slowly holding press conferences urging government authorities to intervene and provide long-overdue redress to these victims. The National Assembly Standing Committee will discuss this issue in a session on Jan. 27 evening. At least these victims have a right to appeal in a higher court," William said.

Figures from CSJ show that last year 343 people were charged with blasphemy, including 19 Christians, five of whom were women.

In Pakistan, blasphemy against Islam and its founder is considered a serious crime punishable by life imprisonment or death. Some critics point out that, in many cases, Pakistan's blasphemy laws are manipulated for private monetary or personal gain.

In addition, groups dedicated to reporting young people who share "blasphemous material" on social media have proliferated. At the end of 2024, Shagufta Kiran, a Christian and mother of four children, was sentenced to death for allegedly spreading blasphemous messages through the WhatsApp messaging service.

In the midst of the hostile environment for Christians in Pakistan, the figure of Akash Bashir stands out, a young Salesian who sacrificed his life in 2015 to prevent a terrorist attack at his church and who is today considered — by Muslims and Christians — as a symbol of unity in the country.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Full Article